On the 23th of March 2015 the 16th Arbitration Appellant Court remained unchanged the resolution of the republican Arbitration Court about collecting debts of the contract for accomplishing works of the technical maintenance natural gas network and percent using outsider cash resources. It amounted more 95 million rubles.
The main task of the specialists of National Law Firm “Mitra”, who represents interests, is a question, how can confirm a good ministration of the technical maintenance natural gas network, if the respondent refused to sign service contract by reason of default of services. The legal expertise of this case clarified the situation: some experts think that under documents partial services without financial valuation, other specialists think the services were in full degree. They motivated it that in the relevant time the applicant had ensured trouble-free technical operation of gas distribution networks. The rigorous analysis of contract, technical and regulatory documents let Mitra`s specialists convince the courts of two instances, that the efficiency and the condition of the gas distribution networks in the relevant time were the irrefutable proof of the provision of services on the technical operation of networks in corpore.
Unfortunately, the practice of deviation payment of services, work or goods delivered is a frequent occurrence in business. But among popular cases on debt contracts` collection often are found the disputes which need a deep understanding of both the economic and legal sides of the relationship of the disputing parties. In such cases, the effective protection of the interests of counterparties without the involvement of highly qualified lawyers is a very difficult task.
